Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
NIH Symposium:
Why Do We Get It Wrong?
  • Methods of Oncology BioMarker Validation:
  • Trying to Get it Right!


  • Daniel F. Hayes, M.D.
2
ASCO Tumor Marker Guidelines Panel
  • ER, PgR Select Endocrine Therapy


  • HER2 Select Trastuzumab


  • CA15-3, CA27.29, CEA Monitor Selected Pts with Metastatic Disease
3
ASCO Tumor Marker Guidelines
  • Why Are the Guidelines So Conservative?
    • Only recommended markers for which results would change clinical decisions
    • Evidence-based
    • Lack of Level of Evidence I or II studies:
      • A Tumor Marker Utility Grading Scale
4
TMUGS:  Levels of Evidence
  • Level Definition
  • I Prospective, Marker Primary Objective, Well-powered OR Meta-analysis


  • II Prospective, Marker Secondary Objective


  • III Retrospective, Outcomes, Multivariate Analysis


  • IV Retrospective, Outcomes, Univariate


  • V Retrospective, Correlation with Other Marker, No Outcomes
5
TMUGS:  Levels of Evidence
  • Level Definition
  • I Prospective, Marker Primary Objective, Well-powered OR Meta-analysis


  • II Prospective, Marker Secondary Objective


  • III Retrospective, Outcomes, Multivariate Analysis


  • IV Retrospective, Outcomes, Univariate


  • V Retrospective, Correlation with Other Marker, No Outcomes
6
When is a Marker Clinically Useful?
  • It is either prognostic or predictive
  • The magnitude of effect is sufficiently large that clinical decisions based on the data result in outcomes that are acceptable
    • Greater chance for benefit
    • Smaller toxicity risk
  • The estimate of magnitude of effect is reliable
    • Assay is reproducible
    • Clinical trial/marker study design is appropriate
    • Results are validated in subsequent well-designed studies
7
 
8
Prognostic Factors:  Clinical Utility
  • How much added benefit is required to justify treatment?
    • Depends on toxicity of treatment
    • Depends on perspective of patients
9
 
10
 
11
Tumor Marker Validation
  • Examples:  Breast Cancer


    • ASSAY SETTING
    • Multi-Gene Expression Adjuvant
    • Rosetta/DNA Array
    • GHI/Multi-gene RT-PCR
    • Circulating Tumor Cells Metastatic
    • Immunicon/Immunomagnetic Separation



12
Tumor Marker Validation
  • Examples:  Breast Cancer


    • ASSAY SETTING
    • Multi-Gene Expression Adjuvant
    • Rosetta/DNA Array
    • GHI/multi-gene RT-PCR
    • Circulating Tumor Cells Metastatic
    • Immunicon/Immunomagnetic Separation



13
Oncotype DX 21 Gene Recurrence Score (RS) Assay
14
NSABP:  Clinical Validation Study of Oncotype DX
  • NSABP 20: Node Neg, ER+, Tam treated patients
  • 10 yr Distant Recurrence
15
NSABP B-14 Clinical Validation Study of Oncotype DX
  • NSABP 14: Node Neg, ER+, Tam treated patients
  • Tam treated patients:  10 year Distant Recurrence
16
 
17
Conclusions
  • Many proposed tumor markers
  • Most studies are LOE III or worse
  • Cooperative Groups are now performing LOE II associated with prospective therapeutic clinical trials
  • New Cooperative Group studies will be LOE I